How good is the Good University Guide?

June 6, 2009
By Duncan Robinson

Mmm. Lies, damn lies and statistics.Was it good for you? The Times have published the holy grail of university rankings. Not for them the hilarious inaccuracy of the Guardian’s league tables – such as ranking Bangor fifth for Maths, despite it not having a maths department – the Good University Guide is generally regarded as the most trustworthy and accurate of all university league tables. This year, however, there has been a slight switch in the Good University Guide and they have changed their methodology.

Now the two main factors involved in deciding how ‘good’ a university is are student satisfaction levels and the RAE assessment. In other words two imperfect systems of analysis coming together to form one really imperfect system of analysis. At first glance, there are no massive changes in the league table, and the top ten and twenty are all relatively predictable.

You’ve got your old universities, followed by the good University of London ones (and Warwick) before you get to the public school ghettos, and then your big old Redbricks. If you asked someone to come up with the top twenty universities in Britain, they would probably mention all these, with a few variables (such as Manchester, Birmingham, Leeds etc.).

The fun only starts when you get into the subject tables and the nitty gritty. Take politics. The top three are Oxford, St Andrews and Sheffield. Some might be surprised to see Sheffield above Cambridge, but the real shock is in 5th place where the mighty Essex resides, due mainly to its stupidly strong research rating. So, does that mean that Essex is better than UCL or LSE as the league table claims?

In short, no.

Essex, like practically every other university in the UK bar Oxbridge, teaches through lectures and seminars. In this format, whether or not the lecturer or seminar leader is a world class researcher is irrelevant. I’ve had lectures from Professors, who may have been extremely well regarded in their field but could not speak fluent English. Just because someone can write well, or has done some ground breaking research, it does not automatically follow that they will be a brilliant lecturer.

In seminars, the seminar leader is far less important than the actual participants. To do well in seminars you need clever, vocal people with whom you can debate. Essex has lower entry standards than most of the universities around it, and so it would not be surprising if the seminar quality was diluted when compared to what you might get at UCL or LSE.

Essex’s politics department also highlights another problem specific to subject tables. Essex overall is ranked 43rd. Its politics department is by far and away its strongest department. As a result, graduate prospects for Essex politics graduates are ranked 23rd. Compare this to Bristol and the opposite applies. Bristol’s high overall ranking (10th) helps give its politics graudates the 6th best graduate prospects, despite only being ranked 28th in the subject. Likewise, Bristol’s higher entry standards probably mean a higher standard of academic discourse in seminars. So which university should the potential politico go for, based on the rankings?

Neither.

Choosing a university is far too important to be left to some ridiculous ranking system, one that throws up more questions and problems than it answers. Yes, have a look at the Good University Guide (and take a peek at the Guardian’s too, but just double check the courses still exist) but ignore the league position. Read the graduate prospects and the entry standards. Check out the student satisfaction levels. But better than that, check out the university’s paper. Facebook some random people at the university. And you should only do this once you’ve found somewhere you actually want to live. It’s no use going to a university in Dullsville just because it’s ranked two places higher Funtown.

University rankings are inevitable, and it looks like we’re stuck with them. But just remember: They’re there to help, not to decide.

Bookmark and Share

Related posts:

  1. Cut, cut, cut! Teaching jobs go at Sheffield University
  2. Don’t worry: your university is not trying to kill you
  3. Sex blogger is former University of Sheffield student
  4. Why Rich Kids Are More Likely To Get Into University

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

2,419 Responses to “ How good is the Good University Guide? ”

  1. Louis Bates on February 7, 2012 at 1:12 pm

    I like your blog, will continue reading your posts

  2. meble biurowe on February 7, 2012 at 1:23 pm

    Ekstra artyku?. Pozdrawiam

  3. Fotografia przyrody on February 7, 2012 at 3:31 pm

    Hey there! I’ve been reading your website for some time now and finally got the bravery to go ahead and give you a shout out from New Caney Texas! Just wanted to tell you keep up the fantastic job!

  4. Oradell Puppet Show on February 7, 2012 at 3:54 pm

    Amazing blog , I really hope how to make my blog this interesting !

  5. Dion Raether on February 7, 2012 at 4:44 pm

    Heya i am with regard to the first period right here. I came across this particular panel and I find It really helpful & this solved the problem away much. I hope to give one thing back and help others such as you aided me personally.

  6. Rodney Keeter on February 7, 2012 at 8:44 pm

    Hello, Neat post. There is an issue with your site in internet explorer, might check this… IE still is the marketplace chief and a big part of folks will miss your fantastic writing because of this problem.

  7. Josefine Gjeltema on February 7, 2012 at 9:56 pm

    hey all, I was just checking out this weblog and I seriously admire the basis of the write-up, and have nothing to perform, so if any person would prefer to to have an engrossing convo about it, please get in touch with me on AIM, my name is heather smith

  8. Gaylord Holtgrewe on February 7, 2012 at 10:22 pm

    I needed to compose you the tiny word to say thanks a lot once again about the remarkable thoughts you have provided on this website. It was tremendously open-handed of people like you to deliver openly all many people would have marketed as an e-book to end up making some money on their own, certainly considering that you could possibly have tried it in case you considered necessary. The principles also served to become great way to be sure that other people online have a similar zeal just as mine to see somewhat more when it comes to this condition. Certainly there are some more fun sessions in the future for those who browse through your website.

  9. ön muhasebe program? on February 8, 2012 at 1:54 am

    I used to be searching for this webpage very last a few days and nights great weblog operator good posts anything is fantastic

  10. Canl? Tv on February 8, 2012 at 2:19 am

    I used to be searching for this great sharing admin much thanks and also have good blogging bye

  11. seo magic on February 8, 2012 at 3:14 am

    I have been surfing online more than three hours as of late, but I never discovered any fascinating article like yours. It is lovely value sufficient for me. In my opinion, if all website owners and bloggers made just right content as you did, the web can be much more helpful than ever before.

  12. Shara Politi on February 8, 2012 at 5:42 am

    An interesting discussion is worth comment.My ICQ:605755362

  13. video on February 8, 2012 at 5:43 am

    Terrific post admin thank you. I found what i was seeking here. I will review overall of posts on this working day

  14. grocery delivery services on February 8, 2012 at 6:38 am

    Im no expert, but I think you just crafted the best point. You naturally comprehend what youre speaking about, and I can seriously get behind that. Thanks for staying so upfront and so genuine.

Leave a Reply